Keep Android Open Saga (5/6)

The social science of Datacenters

Google already has started locking-down android, and, is a few months from completely locking it down. Visit keepandroidopen.org for more information on how it affects you, and, what you can do about it. I will try to make this series easy enough to help you understand why we (as a species) are in this situation now. This post is part 5.

I wish datacenters were thought to us in school. Probably in social science classes. You are able to read this blog post since, this post, is stored on some database on some server (owned by google) on another remote part of this planet. This is the magic of the internet. A layman could easily be humbled here. Not by reading my blog post specifically. And if you are a digital scam victim, that emotion is non-existent now. (But it will come back to you). The significance of these artifacts on earth doesn't get an iota of thought among the average people.

To understand their significance, one must simply look at the plethora of apps on their phone. You will find apps for all niches of urban life (both good/bad). Listing down a few in no particular order:

1. Food delivery apps

2. Weather

3. Mobile banking

4. Matrimony

5. Dating

6. Sex

7. Trekking

9. Renting

10. Education

11. Chatting

12. etc

When an app becomes an internet sensation imagine what would happen to its datacenters. How many such apps do you know? Given that this blog post alludes to a certain company we all can take a good guess what that sensational product might be. Again, let me disclaimer here, that even though I am alluding to very real entity, I would want my readers to generalize, and, not always think of that entity as the entity, but a bunch of human beings influencing other humans for profit. (Be it for others or the self).

Now let's understand the rise of youtube. It started out as a free video streaming platform. It remained that way for many years. It gained popularity, and, its datacenters also grew as consequence. The youtube webservice has its core services exposed over the internet for any developer to access. This had lead to appearance of many alternate mobile viewing clients which streamed youtube. The web-service enablement enabled google to make its mobile app counterpart. Other developers began making alternate clients where people could stream youtube videos. For e.g. NewPipe is one such popular client.

After many years of operating this way, the system resorted to streaming advertisements on its platform. This in itself became publicly annoying. Meanwhile the company rolled out their creator outreach program. The "ads" were central to the effectiveness of this program. Because youtube paid off creators if their venture became successful - i.e many people came to stream videos. Youtube would portion some of the ad revenue to these creators. The creators were getting paid.

But slowly the ads became more frequent and annoying. These clients grew even more popular; not just for the "ad-free" streaming. Some clients allowed for downloading video content. Very soon, youtube allowed for a subscription model for consumers to enjoy ad-free services. And thus, slowly ensued a battle of small-time developers and youtube. A few of these clients allowed for a no-ads experience while not being subscribed. Youtube would change something on its website or service to prevent such clients from working properly, and the developers would always find a way to circumvent those strategies. It was a kind of war.

I suppose the company got fed up with this war. We learn from the previous posts that the "true" purpose of this android lock-down is to protect the consumers from being scammed. What the consumers don't know is that this lock-down allows google to operate the "walled-garden" more effectively. The "lock-down" requires a developer to register; the company can take a decision on allowing a developer onboard the platform. Now if the developer is known to float apps which go directly against a product's terms of service, he/she will not be onboarded. Most apps which fit the category mentioned above will easily be unavailable. It is a corporate win for Google, and the (gullible/vulnerable) consumers.

The important take away here is that to keep a service such as youtube (i.e an online service) "always running", you have to incur massive datacenter operation costs. So where does it make sense to offer service for free? At any point of time? Did the gesture of making it free in the first few years contribute to many good things of today?! 

Thankyou for reading.

Keep Android Open Saga (4/6)

Hello Linux

Google already has started locking-down android, and, is a few months from completely locking it down. Visit keepandroidopen.org for more information on how it affects you, and, what you can do about it. I will try to make this series easy enough to help you understand why we (as a species) are in this situation now. This post is part 4.

Side-loading is not good per people at google. Perhaps they are people who want to be dramatic about it for your security; it makes their jobs easier. They do have the right to save you from being scammed. You - the consumer. Side-loading is a glorified term for obtaining software (and installing in on your phone) on your own without the intervention of the appstore. The software program could come from the internet, or, your friend, school, etc.

But have you heard of Linux? You may equate this term to an operating system. However, what you really need to look into the story about how it came about.

Linux is an operating system software - like android, or windows. Linux stands for is software freedom. And most lay people of today might easily mistake it as a privilege that their phone's appstores give it to them. The right to install any software they want. The actual essence of software freedom is lost when you talk about appstores like the playstore or apple store.

A vital part of this freedom is all about upholding all the following principles when we talk of distributing software:

1. the right to install any software you want and run it on the hardware you own (provided it can).

2. the right to install software from any source.

3. the right to obtain the source code, modify and distribute copies of the modified version

4. the right to run the software the way you want

Android embodies all of this. But the software on their appstores need not really have to. However, the point of focus in point #2. It is the vehicle via which a plethora of digital scams happen today. People can download software from untrusted sources. This way they can perhaps impersonate your banking app and capture your bank's credentials, and, finally siphon your savings. However, one has to realize it is "evil" lurking in the world - doing its bidding - instilling fear in the product managers and consumers.

If linux or even windows was evolved around the concept of a walled garden in the early days, that could have been another parallel universe. A hard/pessismistic fact to admit here is that scams are the natural price or consequence of software freedom. But scamming has always happened throughout human existence sans the advent of computers or "software freedoms". The same phenomenon (i.e digital scams) happens irrespective of people understanding the significance of "software freedoms". We must all come to terms to the flaw in humans as a species. If a victim happens to be reading this, it might be hard to swallow. It doesn't mean the victim is forever weak; everyone eventually comes out of this weakness. 

Let me summarize some key points:

1. Unsuspecting victims fall prey to digital scams. Some of them lose their life savings. Some are driven to suicide and depression.

2. Scams in whatever form cannot be ethically prevented. It means they will keep recurring no matter the technological civilization we live in. Many people accept this hard fact. Still many other people are oblivious to it.

3. But in the face of this, "software freedoms" have evolved, and, gave us the gift of linux. (Android is a derivative of linux). (Although I say this, I mean here that point #2 of the freedoms is essential for such a kind of progress), and, the android os and its appstore violate this principle. It wasn't so at the beginning; when android was in its infancy. Recents events surrounding this topic of side-loading suggests the violation of freedom #2.

4. Now certain people are complaining that side-loading (which is a conflated term for freedom #2). They claim we should get rid of it to protect the consumers.

I can see why people come to that conclusion, but, I wish they upheld freedom #2. At face value these decisions to me (who isn't a victim of digital scams yet) seems incongruent.

I am sure the world is drowning with paranoia because of the digital scams. Let us assume those few people at google win and decide to lock-down android. What then?

The evolution of linux operating system has the answer to this question. So for those unfamiliar with that, I would just say that the speed of innovation might just be slowed down a bit. Now is the world and therefore life/civilization really a balance of "speed of innovation" and "the plethora of scams"? I will leave you to ponder on that.

Thankyou for reading.

Keep Android Open Saga (3/6)

Evil

Google already has started locking-down android, and, is a few months from completely locking it down. Visit keepandroidopen.org for more information on how it affects you, and, what you can do about it. I will try to make this series easy enough to help you understand why we (as a species) are in this situation now. This post is part 3.

Certain corporate developers and tech leaders say that side-loading is a kind of evil. Side-loading is a fancy term to mean obtaining software on android phones through channels other than the formal appstore. There is probably a corporate blog post online which elegantly explains why its evil. And to paint that picture more gullible, they explain a plight of a certain victim of a "developing country". That story could be true or false; I haven't fact checked.

Shocking fact! Nobody really knows why Blue Whale? To learn more about the blue whale app, I suggest you search wikipedia. Today we don't know the evil perpetrators behind it. Perhaps a criminal psychologist can answer this question. Maybe some day someone will...

However, what you must think about is...why at all they (i.e such incidents) happen?

And, why is it "they"? (A plural). I am not alluding to the blue-whale app instance alone; there are other nefarious apps which have existed over time. Every year a new one keeps coming up. It has a different attacking mechanism. For e.g. if you are computer savvy, and you know a little linux, try searching youtube for the xz-hack. 

We are entering into a dark territory of our human existence on Earth. There are a lot of darker chapters when you venture here. Fortunately I am only going to deal with a small (and thus relatively less dark, yet evil) topic about digital scams. 

Lets forget the digital aspect of a much wider phenomenon called "scams". Why do scams happen? Is it the capitalist economy that breeds scams? Or, is it a private desire to feel powerful? Is it revenge? Whatever the reasons or agenda may be, when you observe the facts behind any scam story, the victims show some level of failure or weakness. The scammers engineer the victims to their point of failure. It could be their carelessness. It could be that the victim had a dark past when he/she was younger; that wasn't made public before; and the scammer used this fact to blackmail.

Digital scams are no different. In digital scams, the "technology" factors into the fray. Digital or otherwise, scams continue to crop up in one form or another, and, in ever ingenious ways. 

Can humanity cure "the need for scamming"?

But what will you/we do? 

Stop capitalism? Promote communism? Promote capitalism with furious taxes? Find the gene responsible for megalomania/revenge/jealousy, and, attempt a slow and gradual genocide?!

We've done it all! (Somewhat. Or at least tried). History has all the answers. I don't have all the know-how. For e.g. the holocaust was all about the extermination of a certain race of people, because one set of people who believed they were a superior race, were radicalized to believe that the former group of people were in part inferior, and shrewd business minded people. This interpretation of "why" the holocaust happened, isn't all that complete. But capitalism played its small role in aggravating that "evil".

Let me bring you back to the grand saga for a moment. Do you think a "walled garden" is the solution? Humanity's cure for stopping all scams?! And now again, lets for a moment, forget you knew about walled gardens or scams...what can put a stop to rampant capitalism or aggressive sales marketing in society. (Think about the Wolf Gupta's of our society).

Will an "appstore" stop a "wolf"? The recent events surrounding seems to suggest people think that fortifying that garden they can prevent it to some degree. They are somewhat right. There is a small issue here. I will explore that in the next post.

Thankyou for reading.

Keep Android Open Saga (2/6)

A beautiful draconian garden

Google already has started locking-down android, and, is a few months from completely locking it down. Visit keepandroidopen.org for more information on how it affects you, and, what you can do about it. I will try to make this series to help you understand why we (as a species) are in this situation now. This post is part 2.

Appstores grew in scale. A lot of applications started appearing on it. This software included all possibily imaginable categories - dating, matrimony, games, productivity, health. It is exactly hard to say when and why, but, a lot of nefarious apps came to be available on the appstores. On linux it wasn't much of a headline-news kind of a problem. On android...well, news spread like wild fire. Case in point is an app called Blue Whale. I am intentionally not going into horrific details about that phenomenon. 

Appstores (not just Google's) became a little bit stricter on allowing software to be available on their platforms. In Google's case, a few developers thought that Google's rules were too draconian or strict. For e.g., A clever android developer, made an app which might allow the owner of the phone to control the phone's wifi. And that app lived on the playstore for a while. Many people would have downloaded and became fans of the app. The os developers, on one fine one day, advocated against it. "Software shouldn't over-pressure your hardware". (There is valid reason for this). However, in the end, such applications would be dropped from the appstore. On the other hand, our developer would have had genuine users for this fictious app. They must have had some use for it. And now that google android os developers decided it is a bad thing the users and the concerned app developers, had to suffer disappointment.

That isn't the entire story, however, it is probably one of the reasons "many other" appstores came to sprout. These appstores were specifically for the android operating system. In other words, these alternative appstores were intended to supply software on android phones. But, how were people able to install such software onto the phones? I suppose a lot of MS Windows users of the 90s era might introspect and have an answer to that question. If the answer doesn't come to you, perhaps, become a little social and ask around. 

I made up a fictious scenario to explain why a "walled-garden" came to exist. And "bad fruits" in that garden would be plucked off. Perhaps the use of the word "draconic" in the title is a bit harsh. Because in this fictional scenario the corporate is correct. Why?! Phones are relatively delicate devices. They are powered by lithium batteries. They need to be operated with care. If some software exerted the battery too much the phone could blow up (or explode) on my hand or other body parts, (my eyes for e.g). I could sue google for damages. It is a pessismistic way of putting it. But on a more nobler note, Google is actually trying to protect you - the consumer, by bringing "restrictions" on its platform. 

I hope you'd come to understand that certain people will be concered about these restrictions. They are a small group. The others (i.e the majority) see a very colorful garden where they can get "software they want" downloaded and installed onto their phones.

You probably already understand that "bad fruit" in the context probably means an app that defies a corporate os developer's norms. In the next post, you will have a much wider concept of the term.

Thankyou for reading.

Keep Android Open Saga - (1/6)

Opensource And Appstores

Google already has started locking-down android, and, is a few months from completely locking it down. Visit keepandroidopen.org for more information on how it affects you, and, what you can do about it. I will try to make this series easy enough to help you understand why we (as a species) are in this situation now. This post is part 1.

Opensource was flourishing in the 2005s. Android was born. It was a phone operating system. Being opensource and everything, it meant one could theoretically acquire source code and compile it on their hardware. In reality this is a very complex task; not meant for ordinary folks. 

It was also the age of software proliferation. If there was an app that existed on the Macintosh and it was popular, it slowly made it way onto windows, and, yes eventually android. But that happens a little later in time. 

Before that came appstores. It is a kind of service available on the internet where one could obtain software they want onto their operating system - i.e the android smart phones. The android's appstore was called Google Play or sometimes Playstore. 

But opensource and software proliferation are not the same idea. One must pause and wonder about that last paragraph. Android is opensource. It is linux based. On its own, theoretically speaking, it really doesn't need an appstore. You didn't have to explicitly depend on an organization or corporation to be able to get software onto your phones or other desktop software. Android is kind of a derivative of linux (?). Many flavors of linux that existed around that time - ubuntu, fedora, archlinux, etc - they too had the same concept (as that of appstores) but it was commonly called "repositories". The primary "function" of the repositories was to make your computer "less vulnerable" or "more secure". And from this point of view, appstores became more "strict" or "harsh".

Ordinary people take many aspects of Android (or iOS) for granted. For e.g. many people are unaware how the phone is able to notify you of a new chat message (on whatsapp/telegram/instagram/whatever)? (To keep things short, it isn't like an SMS notification). There is a great deal of cloud infrastructure and related redundancies in place. When you buy a phone, nobody tells you that some part of your identity is going to live on that infrastructure. 

Appstores are a small part in that entire infrastructure. In the next part we will try to understand more about the various roles appstores came to have over the years. 

Thankyou for reading.

A collatz weekend

TLDR; found an opensource python software for printing a graph. My program got referenced by the developer over at the repo discussions page. Understood where ascii and where graphical printing makes sense. I also share a few thoughts on opensource. 

My youtube algorithm suggested a Veritasium video on the collatz conjecture. In it there was a graph - for a long time I wanted to print it. Here is an example of the graph which was shown in the Veritasium video. And what follows are two images I generated using other opensource software.

Fig1. Graph plot from the Veritasium video

Fig 2. pygraphviz plot

Fig 3. Ascii plot using binarytree python library

These graphs are generally called collatz graph or collatz chains. It is built on a simple mathematical rule which we won't discuss here. The specific graph I have printed is called a reverse-collatz graph. But note that the 3rd image is an ascii print of the same graph. 

Oh wait! Do you know what is a "graph"? Or do you know what "ascii" is? I think I must devote some time to introduce some fancy computer science terms. However, I am not going to delve deep into them. The impatient readers can skip the next few sections and directly read from the section called "My opensource library hunt"

Graphs

YOU don't really need to know what a graph is...It has no significance in your day-to-day life! That picture above is an example of a graph. It is a node which is connected to other nodes via lines called edges. In practice, the nodes/edges represent something. I am sure most visitors here have used Google Maps; it uses "graphs". Its neatly abstracted to you, the consumer. 

Binary Tree

The collatz graph which I tried to print is a kind of "binary tree". I have hidden most of the "binariness" to make it look plesant. Another example of a binary tree is the famous pascal's triangle. This is another mathematical term that is of no consequence to people's lives.

Fig 4. Somewhere in Ladakh

Yet it is out there in world. Staring back at you. Oblivious; in plain sight.

ASCII

It is an encoding standard for storing and transmitting information. Simply put if I save some text file (with a few sentences) onto a disk, and, I sent that disk to you...you use your computer to access that disk and read that text file and it contents...if the computer displays the correct sentences - how do you think that is possible?

This is a remarkable invention by human beings. It is the backbone of the internet. It is because of ascii many subtle things happen in life - good or bad:

1. You are able to read this blog post.

2. An expectant father is able to view the first pictures of his new born child while he is located on a different continent compared to his spouse's labour ward.

3. People nefariously indulge in relatively evil practices like pornography, blackmail, riots, etc.

4. Etc.

Shakespear once said, the web of life is of mingled yarn - the good and bad together. Maybe I failed in social science - and today its via ascii that I am coming to realize a lot more about our own species. (And I am a quadrigenarian)

Why print in ascii?

1. I can easily print the graph in a text file

2. I don't have to worry about scale. Most plotting libraries, will take into account the drawing area and auto-scale the plots.

3. I don't need special software to view my outputs. A simple text editor (with word-wrap-off) would do.

My opensource library hunt

In python, we usually have matplotlib for plotting stuff. But instead I thought that I would want to see the graphs better and not be worried about "scale" or drawing-area-sizes. Therefore ascii; there was no further reason than that initially. 

Finally came to discover a small library phart - Python Heirarchial Ascii Rendering Tool. Of course if you are someone who quickly alluded to some nasty things humans and often other mammals indulge in; you are excused.

The version I had got via pypi (i.e. pip install). It had a dependency of another pythonic graph software called "networkx". It was fairly quick for me to setup and get to printing outputs. But later I came to understand that the plots were incorrect. And I posted in on the github repo discussions. I waited for the response. Meanwhile I discovered another graph plotting package. This wasn't a python library. It was a C program called graphiviz. And there were python ports of graphviz which I then explored. And it internally used matplotlib to plot. But then the phart developer of the repo got back with fixes to my issue. And then I got to printing.

What kind of plot to choose and when?

This section won't be useful for anyone unless you are into research involving graph theory or you need to do some graph based computations.

(A) Choose a image-based graph plotting solutions when you need the following:

1. Auto-scaling.

2. High detail in nodes/edges

3. Aesthetics

(B) Choose ascii graph plotting when you need the following:

1. Searchability

2. Plotting to scale is not needed

3. Simple text file based sharing is important.

Most people will choose approach A. However, the final say is really a matter of requirement. I was doing it as a weekend fun project. If I were a PG student writing a research paper on the Collatz conjecture, I'd probably do both ascii printing and graphical renderings. But I'd use the latter when I write my research paper.

Opensource Affairs

Here is a small appreciation to phart developer and opensource

When I first tinkered with phart it was buggy. My output wasn't coming right. I thought it may be my incorrect use of the APIs. I posted onto the repo discussions page, and, in fact shared by whole program there and asked the developer if I was doing it wrong. He admitted his code had a bug. And he fixed it in a span of few days. It didn't matter if he took a month, or, even a year. He got back to me. These are qualities I adore.

Fig 5. ascii plot using phart

I have posted issues and interacted in developer forums and slack groups of other opensource software. The larger they are it is likely that the issue you post (or raise) is not given enough attention. There are many reasons why this can happen, but, I leave it to you the reader. And there are a few issues I have raised in some repos that belong to a few infamous organizations that need attention.

[Rant] Google Photos Library API ens***tification

TLDR; Google Photos Library API is intentionally limited. Most tutorials will show how you can access your entire data. They are outdated. This is the state in Feb 2026.

I am a Google one customer. Most people know that this means I rent a finite amount of cloud storage. My Google Photos takes a significant amount of storage space. Now that storage is becoming full. 

So naturally I wanted to off-load. It is somewhat possible through their website app; but that can be cumbersome. Google Photos Library API showed some promise. I believed that I could access data on Google programmatically. I had experiencd with Google Apps Scripts before, and, believed this was possible.

Being the relatively lonesome developer that I am...I thought I could quickly hack some python program to help me out with this task. 

The choice of "python" is inconsequential. Most google searches related to this topic will result in some pythonic script which understands how to talk to the library api. But make note, that I have never tried this before, and, I have heard or had a faint memory that google allows you to programmatically access your data stored on its various services.

Therefore I thought this farce objective of mine was achievable. And I set about a journey to learn how to work the python code and learn from video tutorials and blogs on the subject. 

This is where you walk into a realm of oauth authentication. If you aren't a developer you can skip over this paragraph. And I am not going to go into this topic deeply either. There is a technical term associated with it called permission scopes (aka permissions) which controls your access to your "resource". Most tutorials say that "you have to this specific scope" and you magically can access your "resource".

Lo and behold...when I tried the tutorial examples myself, I was unable to access my data on Google photos. I initially got "request forbidden" or that I am "unauthorised". I understood that this meant I misconfigured some permission. I later fixed it. (After referring to documentation). And on the next trial, the script executed without errors and said that I had no albums!!?

That is when I took a closer read of the documentation. There was a link to an update. That further confirmed more disappointment. They have sunset the ability to entirely access since March 2025. I am trying to learn all this, with the mislead hope, in Feb 2026! And now I wonder why the tutorials weren't updated! 😖

So the state of affairs now is that you can script and upload data, and, download/access that data you have uploaded via that script. This hardly solves my requirement. There was probably a time developers had access to entire data. But Google has now intentionally limited this. I am frustrated at this pattern of capitalism that I decline to comment further on this.

I could have used AI to help. But honestly it was too early for that. I was simply on a exploration spree and I hit mildly sad news. However all internet searches prior to being "saddened" said that my goal was achievable. 

For those who have reached this paragraph, Google Takeout is the only option for a complete backup. I hear that it thorns and caveats. I shall leave it for the world to rant on that subject.